From these two simplified definitions, it seems clear that both terms can partially overlap when ecocide concerns human species, or when genocide aims at destroying the natural habitat of a group of people. by military operations, catastrophes, and illegal disposal of toxic waste but also air pollution, oil spills, soil erosion, illegal markets of medicines or plundering of natural resources – such as post-Cold-War pillage of minerals, metals or timber). The former term refers to acts committed to destroy particular (national, ethnic, racial, religious) groups of people by killing or severely harming their members or inflicting their conditions of life (among other acts), whereas the latter means substantial damaging or destroying of ecosystems, or harming the health and well-being of a species (e.g. Far less lawyers are aware of the concept of “ ecocide”. The term was coined based on his earlier concepts of “ barbarity” and “ vandalism”, in reaction to the impunity of Ottoman perpetrators of the 1915-1917 Armenian genocide, and subsequently used to describe the atrocities committed under the Nazi occupation. He is a graduate of the Global Campus of Human Rights, and an alumnus of College of Europe in Natolin and Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan.Įvery European lawyer is familiar with the term “ genocide”, introduced in 1944 by Raphael Lemkin, a Polish lawyer of Jewish descent. Currently, he is a PhD candidate in political science at the Andrassy University in Budapest. Jakub Wojsyk is a Polish lawyer and europeanist.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |